On 3/12/07, John Clogg <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> Michael,
> Perhaps the fact that that English is not your first language explains why
> you failed to grasp the rather simple concept put forth in Mark's message.
> Let me try again:  Bill Clinton was not impeached for having an
> extramarital
> affair; he was impeached for committing perjury.  Any questions?
>
> John Clogg
>
>
Simpler still: nobody died when Clinton lied. Not the same can be said for
the lies about the link between 9/11 and Saddam Hussein (none) and WMDs in
Iraq (none).

I personally felt at the time that Clinton should have resigned when it was
revealed that he had perjured himself.

Just think, Gore would have been president before the 2000 elections,
probably would have been elected president in 2000 (come to think of it, he
WAS!), and would have been president on August 6th 2001 when the 'Bin Laden
preparing to attack' memo was delivered to the White House.

Gore certainly would have taken it more seriously than Bush. If not, at
least on September 12th there would have been an announcement that we would
begin spending $50 billion to develop alternate energy sources designed to
enrich farmers instead of 'haters of freedom'.

$50 billion would have been a lot less than we are going to spend on Iraq.
It just proves once and for all: Iraq is CLINTON'S fault.

How's this for a bumper sticker: Iraq: Love it or leave it . . .

PS - no need for impolite cracks about someone's second language . . .

* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *