HP3000-L Archives

September 2004, Week 2

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
James Hofmeister <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
James Hofmeister <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 10 Sep 2004 00:45:08 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (41 lines)
Hello Greg,

RE: 7.0 vs. 7.5

I will give you a resounding vote for 7.5.

I perceive that a greater percentage of our support customers some of
whom are in the process of migrating and some homesteading are running
7.5 with power patch 1 as their parking release.   Some of these
customers are still pursuing urgent fixes as necessary, some are
installing power patch 2 and some are also installing the new features
of 7.5.

Your greatest opportunity would be to take advantage of the customer
testing of this release as well as the availability of their urgent
fixes by choosing to install 7.5 with power patch 1 or power patch 2.

Regards,
  James Hofmeister
  Email: <first>.<last>@hp.com
  Hewlett Packard - Global Solutions Engineering (WTEC)
  P.S. My Ideals are my own, not necessarily my employers.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Greg Stigers" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2004 10:49 PM
Subject: [HP3000-L] 7.0 vs. 7.5


> What is the compelling case for upgrading from 7.0 to 7.5?
>
> Greg Stigers
>
> * To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
> * etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
>

* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *

ATOM RSS1 RSS2