HP3000-L Archives

September 2000, Week 4

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Cortlandt Wilson <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Cortlandt Wilson <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 27 Sep 2000 15:20:04 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (41 lines)
>  in the SIG's, did HP respond with anything other than "we are busy
> with IA64"

What was said of the status of IA64 for MPE?    I don't know of an
official status report since 1998.

- Cortlandt

P.S.  HP now has a IA64 program for NT, Linux, and HP-UX but nothing
for MPE/iX.


"Chuck Ryan" <[log in to unmask]> wrote in message
news:39c918d5$3_1@skycache-news.fidnet.com...
> For those of you that went to HP World:
>
> In an earlier thread I asked if there was any new, non-posix,
development
> for the 3000 underway at CSY that did more than just keep up with
growing
> resource requirements or support for new hardware released by HP.
Mark Bixby
> responded with "I'll leave any announcements for the appropriate
people to
> make at HPWorld".
>
> So, did anyone hear anything interesting?
>
> Also, in the SIG's, did HP respond with anything other than "we are
busy
> with IA64" when asked about an item on the SIG's enhancement request
list?
> This was the only answer I heard at the last HP World I attended and
it
> replaced the "we are busy with Y2K". (I tried to find a way to word
this so
> it did not sound overly negative, as it is not really meant to be,
but more
> as an indication of frustration with the previous answers).
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2