Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | Emerson, Tom |
Date: | Wed, 12 Nov 2003 09:22:03 -0800 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Greg Stigers [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
>
> The catch-22 is this. I have asked questions that
> are, on the one hand, off-topic, [in that they are not HP3000 specific]
> but [...] they are more on topic than the politics and religion
[...]
>
> It seems that the only option is to no longer label such question OT.
Well, we've trained people to include "OT:" more-or-less when appropriate (there are probably a few stragglers, myself included, who occaisionally slip) Now if we can get folks to sub-categorize in what way they are "off" topic, I can set the list to avoid OT:POL(itical) and OT:REL(igion) yet keep OT:TECH(nical-non-3000) :) [and set a rule in my client for OT:HUM(o[u]r) to auto-forward to my dad ;) ]
Now, which tag did I need for list administrivia and/or suggestions?
* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
|
|
|