HP3000-L Archives

July 2000, Week 2

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"COLE,GLENN (Non-HP-SantaClara,ex2)" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
COLE,GLENN (Non-HP-SantaClara,ex2)
Date:
Fri, 14 Jul 2000 14:02:02 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (30 lines)
Lars writes:

> Is it possble that there are different "flavors" or versions
> of CORBA that won't work together?

I'm certainly NOT a CORBA expert (or even close).

I had one class (NOT hands-on) late last year on distributing
computing, which focused on CORBA.  The feeling there was that
it was "safer" to stick to one ORB.

However, I'll be in a hands-on class next week on Java + CORBA.

   http://www.BruceEckel.com/CorbaJavaSeminar.html

One of the promises from that web page is

   The Object Management Group's CORBA 2.2 specification
   (and soon 3.0) has a more finely defined ORB in which
   portability takes a high priority.  The Java programming
   language was designed with portability in mind.  These two
   terrific technologies, when used correctly, will enable you
   to create distributed systems that are ORB neutral.
   No longer will you have to ask "Which ORB are you using?"

So yes, it is MORE than possible to have two ORBs that do not
work together.

--Glenn

ATOM RSS1 RSS2