Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Mon, 6 May 2002 09:48:18 +0200 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
> Date: Sun, 5 May 2002 16:48:08 -0700
> From: Tom Emerson <[log in to unmask]>
......
> What strike me as odd is that nobody has noticed (or at least commented on)
> the fact that Mr. Cappelas's statement is, well, truly stupid [that's using
> the "nice" term...]
>
> As I recall, the statement was "Unix will be replaced by windows and
> linux" -- think about that a moment, and consider (or realize) the fact that
> Linux *IS* Unix
......
> Am I misinterpreting something here? Or was his "statement" something
> cooked up by some adman high on some substance not purchased from the corner
Of course from a technical perpective Linux is Unix. Which is
probably very confusing for non-tech business types, since from
the perspective of a business model, its nothing they've ever
seen before. I suppose the reasoning is "we charge for Unix. We
don't charge for Linux, therefore Linux is not Unix".
Jerry Finn
[log in to unmask]
* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
|
|
|