HP3000-L Archives

August 2000, Week 3

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Richard Gambrell <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Richard Gambrell <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 21 Aug 2000 21:50:26 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (34 lines)
Most so-called integrated solutions that your talking about have
modules that barely manage to talk to the same product's other
modules.  Many are made up from bits and layers from multiple,
changing "partners" with layers and chewing gum for integration.
YOu have to have a third machine to "configure" the product on
before upgrading to a new release, otherwise you'd be down for three
days or more (the other two machines are needed to keep the production
system running).

The difference with MPE is that you get to choose  your system
integrator and they do it as custom work that works for you company
instead of the one size fits all stragegy too common among the more
successful at marketing put over on you.  With the MPE way you get a
better fitting, more robust solution that fits your business needs,
and with costs less to obtain and less to operate and less to upgrade.

Richard

dsilva wrote:
>
>     No bits and pieces.   Integrated solutions that talk to one another.  One vendor perhaps?   Did  I spell the needs in the previous post?  Let me go back a re-read my post.  Geez.

--
Richard L Gambrell
Senior Information Technology Consultant
University of Tennessee at Chattanooga
103 Hunter Hall, Dept. 4454
615 McCallie Ave., Chattanooga, TN 37403-2598
voice mail/cell phone: 423-432-5122
private e-mail: [log in to unmask]
UTC fax: 423-755-4150
UTC phone: 423-755-4551
UTC email: [log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2