>NOW, we have a big, intrusive federal monster which cannot be
avoided,because it holds all the states in lockstep.

Although this is tirue, it not new.  Our freedoms have been eroded over a
long period of time.  The problem is that the democrats are far more
repsonsible for the socialization than the Republicans.  Republicans run on
limited government but tend to cave in to get votes. This slows the progress
in the achieving a socialist state that the democrat party wants, but it
still gets us there.
If it were left to the clintons. gores, kennedys and kerry's we'd lose all
of our constitutional rights over night.

I would love to meet a democrat that believes in states rights.

jm
----- Original Message -----
From: "Brice Yokem" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2004 4:59 PM
Subject: Re: [HP3000-L] OT: The cycle of democracy


> This country was indended to be a collection of independent states
> bound together by a limited government.  This allowed people to leave
> a state if it got too oppressive, and move to another.
>
> NOW, we have a big, intrusive federal monster which cannot be avoided,
> because it holds all the states in lockstep.
>
> * To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
> * etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
>

* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *