Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Mon, 2 Jan 1995 18:55:24 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
>Date: Fri, 16 Dec 1994 15:09:00 PST
>From: Tom Stelter <[log in to unmask]>
>Subject: HP Oldtimers
>
>pss. No one has mentioned that special pc(humor) called the HP250 and the
>Business Basic language.
>
>>Date: Fri, 16 Dec 1994 14:56:37 -0800
>>From: Bruce Toback <[log in to unmask]>
>>Subject: Re: HP Oldtimers
>>
>>Tom Stelter writes:
>>pss. No one has mentioned that special pc(humor) called the HP250 and the
>>Business Basic language.
>>
>>Actually, the 250 was a very successful product. One of the reasons for the
>>existence of Business Basic on the 3000 is that there was a crying need
>>for an upgrade path. The 250 ran IMAGE and a forms package very much like
>>VPlus; it also supported extra terminals. It was a popular platform for
>>OEMs and systems houses.
>>
>>-- Bruce
I liked the HP250 (and later the HP260) very much:) It was a great little
machine. At one time in the early '80s I was doing consulting work on nine
different clients that had the HP250, and continued to do independent
consulting on one of them until two years ago. It had IMAGE, a "VPLUS" ish
screen handler, and function key access built right into BASIC; it could talk
to the HP3000; your could hang system printers off the HP-IB; you could have
up to ten terminals (and in later years, each terminal could have a slave
printer attached and easily usable); it had a complete, powerful, plotter and
mathmatics sub-systems; and I thought the IMAGE utilites were friendlier then
on the early HP3000. Unfortunately, it was all interpreted and not
very fast:(
+---------+
|JJJJJJBBBB\ Thanx, Jon Backus
+---+JJBB BB| 15 Catawba Place
|JJBBBB< Hagerstown, MD 21742-6515
+-+ |JJBB BB|
|JJ\/JJBB BB| Voice: 1-301-714-0446, Fax: 1-301-714-1854
\JJJJ/BBBB/ Car: 1-301-667-6396, E-mail: [log in to unmask]
|
|
|