At 02:53 04/07/2000 -0600, [log in to unmask] wrote:
>We had a 957 which wouldn't perform with more than 30 or so users so we
>decided to move to a 979KS200 (it's not called 'overkill', it's called
>'future-proofing') with 100 user licence.  The whole project took around 6
>weeks from specification to implementation.

Something's wrong here.  I've been running a 957 for several years with
a peak load of 200/230 users, up to 12 jobs, and 50 or 60 SQL connections
(a mix of 16 and 32-bit drivers).  Performance could be better,
BUT the users get their work done.

I **dream** of a 9x9!

Cheers,
Ron Burnett
Women's & Children's Health
Melbourne, Australia