HP3000-L Archives

February 2003, Week 4

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Duane Percox <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Duane Percox <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 24 Feb 2003 17:12:46 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (25 lines)
Alfredo writes:

>"Irrelevant" is a word that must be used (if at all) very humbly.

I most wholeheartedly agree. I was only reporting what I have been
reading. And - while discussing various issues with a HP employee
within the last month they used the same term. I think there has
been some in-house proliferation going on :-)

I think Intel might be also be concerned about similar feelings
toward their arch rival AMD given recent product announcements
in the 64-bit Intel chip space. It is definitely foolish to
go about dismissing competitors, especially those who have
shown a great ability to compete fiercely.

And how about Apple? They are making some very interesting
strategic moves recently which might end up giving ms some
real problems. And I bet Bill and co have definitely viewed
Apple as 'irrelevant' WRT the desktop.

duane percox

* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *

ATOM RSS1 RSS2