HP3000-L Archives

January 1995, Week 1

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Eric Schubert <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Eric Schubert <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 5 Jan 1995 16:33:24 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (24 lines)
At 11:47 AM 1/4/95 PST, [log in to unmask] wrote:
>
>VT has two advantages over Telnet.
  <snip>
 
Frank,
 
  You argue about Telnet -vs- VT within the context of technical merits --
which is ok, but how about throwing weight on the side of telnet for what it
is -- an open spec;  if you want to talk to anyone else within the world,
you do telnet.
 
I see telnet more as "what you can do with it" rather than "is it better?"
 
  As for VT technology better than Telnet standards:  Hey, I bought a beta
video machine because the technology WAS better!  I reasoned that better
technology would dominate!  Ha! was I wrong.  Only clout (being first)  and
marketing presence prevail when two products do not have large advantages
between each other.  The same is true between VT and Telnet.  Sad, but true.
 
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Eric J. Schubert                 Administrative Information Services
Senior Data Base Analyst         University of Notre Dame, IN USA

ATOM RSS1 RSS2