Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Wed, 25 Jun 1997 10:44:03 -0700 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Jim Phillips writes:
>>1. If method #1 ever loses sync -- that is, if it ever misinterprets data
>>as a length -- the chance of recovering is tiny, and the chance of
>>recovering without damaging data somewhere is tiny squared.
>
>Well, at the risk of wasting bandwidth (aw, what the heck!):
I agree, obviously :-)...
>If tiny is greater than 1, then tiny to the second power is greater
>than tiny (to the first power); that is:
>
>Tiny**2 > Tiny
True, but a _chance_ must by definition be <= 1, so a tiny chance must be
0 < p << 1.
-- Bruce
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bruce Toback Tel: (602) 996-8601| My candle burns at both ends;
OPT, Inc. (800) 858-4507| It will not last the night;
11801 N. Tatum Blvd. Ste. 142 | But ah, my foes, and oh, my friends -
Phoenix AZ 85028 | It gives a lovely light.
[log in to unmask] | -- Edna St. Vincent Millay
|
|
|