HP3000-L Archives

November 2001, Week 2

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: nasty rumor
From:
Greg Terterian <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
[log in to unmask]
Date:
Fri, 9 Nov 2001 14:18:33 EST
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (17 lines) 
In a message dated 11/9/2001 10:20:11 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[log in to unmask] writes:


> The assumption would be that most MPE customers would convert to HPUX or
> some other HP-supported OS.
>

Wrong!!!  HPUX is not even close being as reliable as HP3000 has been, so if
anything (of course I will hang on to my HP3000, even if I am the last person
on this planet with HP3000), people will move on to either IBM or Windows NT.
Why would anybody stick around with HP without HP3000?  In my opinion (please
read it twice - this is only my opinion),  HP became HP because of HP3000.

* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *

ATOM RSS1 RSS2