Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Sun, 10 Aug 2003 23:34:02 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Ahhh Wirt,
That would make my day....! For myself, I'm voting for "None of the
above" or "below" as the balot may read.
Eric Sand
[log in to unmask]
-----Original Message-----
From: Wirt Atmar [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Sunday, August 10, 2003 3:41 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [HP3000-L] Image Jumbo vs. largefiles
Stan writes:
> > P.S. Wouldn't it have been wonderful if, way back then, the Lab had
> > bitten the bullet and modified the file system to extend the size limit
> > on files instead of resorting to the jumbo dataset kludge.
>
> Yes, and that's what we argued HP should do.
>
> Only after losing the argument did we take the contract to
> add jumbo datasets to IMAGE.
That's kind of a California philosophy. Vote NO on the recall question, but
if you vote YES, be sure that you vote for me :-).
Wirt Atmar
* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
|
|
|