HP3000-L Archives

August 2003, Week 2

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Eric Sand <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Eric Sand <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 10 Aug 2003 23:34:02 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (36 lines)
Ahhh Wirt,
    That would make my day....! For myself, I'm voting for "None of the
above" or "below" as the balot may read.

     Eric Sand
     [log in to unmask]

-----Original Message-----
From: Wirt Atmar [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Sunday, August 10, 2003 3:41 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [HP3000-L] Image Jumbo vs. largefiles


Stan writes:

> > P.S. Wouldn't it have been wonderful if, way back then, the Lab had
>  > bitten the bullet and modified the file system to extend the size limit
>  > on files instead of resorting to the jumbo dataset kludge.
>
>  Yes, and that's what we argued HP should do.
>
>  Only after losing the argument did we take the contract to
>  add jumbo datasets to IMAGE.

That's kind of a California philosophy. Vote NO on the recall question, but
if you vote YES, be sure that you vote for me :-).

Wirt Atmar

* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *

* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *

ATOM RSS1 RSS2