HP3000-L Archives

October 1995, Week 2

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Barry Lake <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Barry Lake <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 9 Oct 1995 13:50:04 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (29 lines)
In article <[log in to unmask]>, [log in to unmask]
(Doug Johnson) wrote:
 
[snip]
 
> PS. I did the 5.0 upgrade three weeks ago and am now waiting on my
> THIRD patch tape to correct various problems. ALL the patches were
> available when I did the upgrade and a week prior to the  upgrade
> I requested and received a Power Patch with susbsys just to avoid
> this problem. Am I an exception or another slightly dissatisfied
> customer
>
 
You're not an exception. Before upgrading a couple weeks ago, we *made
sure* we had all the most up-to-date patches, etc. However, we find today
a number of "ghost" VT sessions that show SYS ownership and cannot be
cleared without a reboot. HP is sending a patch to us. I had this exact
problem under MPE/iX 4.0 and got a patch for it then as well. Now the
problem has reappeared under 5.0! Doesn't HP roll previous patches into
their newest releases? Anyway, I'm mildly miffed, but not really
dissatisfied. The 5.0 release has performed quite well, aside from this VT
problem. Overall, I'd say "Great job HP!"
 
Cheers
 
Barry Lake
 
"If you're not on the edge you're taking up too much space"

ATOM RSS1 RSS2