Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Thu, 2 May 2002 13:20:18 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Bill Todd wrote:
> "David Froble" <[log in to unmask]> wrote in message
> news:3CD0CAA5.1010202@tsoft-inc.com...
>
>>Hey Bill, do you do anything besides watch for Rob's posts? I never get
>>
> to jump
>
>>on him first.
>>
>
> Actually, it's Rob's posts that seem to jump out at me, and responses have
> become almost automatic since his material doesn't change much. Of course,
> that can give my responses a certain sameness as well...
>
> Just to break the monotony, I'm thinking of making up a Letterman-style 'top
> ten' list of reasons why we're all still breathlessly awaiting the public
> debut of Itanic 2.
That would be entertaining.
> At this rate, EV7 and Hammer may not only be
> embarrassingly faster, but embarrassingly faster to market as well. And
> (while on the subject of Itanic 2's wondrous performance if and when), I was
> surprised to notice recently that USIII
Forgive my ignorance, or possibly failing memory. Who is USIII? What is their
product? Is this the current name for those producing MIPS?
> has made it up to 610 in SPECint2K
> performance: wouldn't it be amusing if after all the "Just wait for
> McKinley!" hype over the past year Itanic *still* turned out to be at the
> back of the pack?
>
> - bill
Amusing yes, surprising no.
Dave
* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
|
|
|