Chris Bartram wrote:
> A 3000 can't (yet) be a DNS Server. It can "resolve" but not serve.
> Hopefully this will change someday (i.e. if someone gets BIND ported).
Let me clarify this - it is of general relevance although it might
appear as a <plug>. The 3000 DNS "client" (resolver) can only resolve
A-records for a given name. It doesn't handle other entries (MX in
particular). <semi-plug> Chris finally did his own internal DNS
resolution in his NetMail/DeskLink products since the 3000 didn't do MX
queries </semi-plug>. It also has problems with PTR and CNAME entries,
but I'm
getting too detailed.
The 3000 cannot be a DNS server, and is only a crippled DNS resolver.
Jeff Kell <[log in to unmask]>