open MPE?
just re-entering the arena what is going on... is hp going to release
source for mpe now that it has issued a death warrent for it? This could
seem to be the most gentelmanly approach HP could take actually.....
Please check our web site at
http://www.smecc.org
to see other engineering fields, communications and computation stuff we
buy, and by all means when in Arizona drop in and see us.
address:
coury house / smecc
5802 w palmaire ave
glendale az 85301
thanks Ed Sharpe archivist for SMECC
----- Original Message -----
From: "Joseph Dolliver" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 7:10 PM
Subject: Re: [HP3000-L] Workload Manager on MPE/iX + ITRC Patch Site
> Yeah, Let OpenMPE take control of MPE. Things would be better then.
>
> Joe
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: HP-3000 Systems Discussion [mailto:[log in to unmask]]On
> Behalf Of John R. Wolff
> Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 1:25 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: [HP3000-L] Workload Manager on MPE/iX + ITRC Patch Site
>
>
> I have been working with the Workload Manager features of MPE/iX lately,
> and am quite impressed with the ability to fine tune system performance by
> finely targeting individual users and programs with higher or lower
> priority assignments, among other things. In essence, you can subdivide
> the CS queue (for example) into sub-queues. One of the things I did with
> it is to treat the UDC/Command File processes, that run before & after a
> core application program, differently from the program itself for overall
> better system performance. (I realize that something like this can be
done
> crudely with the PRI= options that mixes JOB queues DS & ES with CS; but,
> the Workload Manager is much more flexible than that).
>
> I am not aware of any similar control under HP-UX for individual
processes,
> just kernel parameters that affect the entire system. Is there some kind
> of HP or third party product available for HP-UX that allows this? If
not,
> this is an example of better OS design within MPE/IX compared to UNIX.
>
> **************************************************************************
>
> On another subject, am I the only one that thinks the ITRC website for
> MPE/iX patches is difficult to use? Why are there no dates associated
with
> the release of the patches (which should be sortable)? If one wants to
> monitor the site for new patches it is nearly impossible. Any comments or
> suggestions?
>
> John Wolff
>
> * To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
> * etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
>
> * To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
> * etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
>
>
* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
|
