 
| Subject: | |
| From: | |
| Reply To: | [log in to unmask][log in to unmask], 7 Mar 1997 08:54:08 -0500679_ISO-8859-1 *******SPECIAL ALERT********* Last year, a friend of mine upgraded his "Girlfriend 3.1" to "Girlfriend PLUS 1.0" (marketing name: Fiancee' 1.0 [beta]). Recently he upgraded "Fiancee 1.0" to "Wife 1.0" and determined it to be a memory hogger, and found that it has consumed all of his available space and system resources. "Wife 1.0" must be running before he can accomplish anything, and seems to conflict with other running tasks such as: "NetSurf 3.0", "Bowling 3.01", "NFLSunday 4.0", "BoysNightOut 1.2", and "BabeHunt 6.0". [...]39_7Mar199708:54: [log in to unmask] |
| Date: | Thu, 6 Mar 1997 20:02:33 +0000 |
| Content-Type: | text/plain |
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Hi Scott,
I have been using DTC Manager on the 3000 for a longggg time and I'v
alway been under the impression (mistaken?) that you have to use the
openview and dtc mgr for windows 3.1 (and 95/NT if I ever get the
software) version to control DTC's on the 3000. I have Openview on a
unix box and whenever I have asked when dtc mgr for the 3000 will be
supported the answer has always been, take a DEEP breath. If I'm
wrong someone from HP give me a product No.!
John "Blue eyes, blue lips, blue face" Skelton
> I'm new to the 3000 and am trying to configure a DTC 16RX to enable terminal
> access. The DTC has been configured using the DTC Manager software loaded on
> one of our 9000s. Using a terminal connected to the DTC, I can connect to
> every system with the exception of our 3000 (928LX w/ MPE/iX 5.0). The message
> "Connection Refused" is the result. The DTC has been configured in NMMGR, and
> LDEVs assigned to its ports. The DTC validation runs with no errors, as well.
> After the network configuration file is saved and the system restarted, the DTC
> does not appear in the list of configured DTCs in the system diagnostics, but
> is still present in the NMMGR configuration file. The HP documentation seems
> to indicate that the DTC's MAC address and its IP address do not need to be
> included in the NMMGR configuration file, since the config info is being
> supplied by the 9000. I've tried it both ways without any success. Any
> assistance on this (hopefully) simple problem would be greatly appreciated.
>
> Thanks!
> Scott Stewart
>
>
|
|
|
