HP3000-L Archives

December 2000, Week 3

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Dave Darnell <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Dave Darnell <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 20 Dec 2000 08:39:59 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (32 lines)
This brings up a question that has been in the back of my mind for some
time:

Is there any reason why a .com address or domain could not (as opposed to
"should not") be hosted in, say, the UK, or a .UK address or domain be
hosted in the US?

-Dave

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joseph Rosenblatt [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 20, 2000 8:13 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: MS Software
>
>
> Robert Mills Queries:
> >Wonder if they are only interested in people that live on
> the western side
> of the pond?
>
> That is an interesting idea. What makes it more interesting
> is that many of
> the SPAM mails I have received originate on the eastern side
> of the pond or
> at least have a UK suffix. (This particular one started right
> here in the
> USA .) I am sure SPAM laws, regulations, self imposed
> industry standards are
> different in the UK but how much different?
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2