Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Fri, 14 Feb 2003 14:18:04 -0700 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On Friday, February 14, 2003, at 01:33 PM, Tom Brandt wrote:
> At 12:58 PM 2/14/2003 -0700, Fred White wrote:
>
> On Friday, February 14, 2003, at 07:31 AM, Tom Brandt wrote:
>
> The validity of on-line polls using self-selected responders: 0%
>
>
> I agree with the idea that they're validity is suspect. One doesn't
> need to toss the results into the trash. One can accept them without
> believing that they are (even close to) perfect. The 0% you assigned
> implies that they're absolutely false. Is that the result of a 1-person
> poll? :-)
>
> Yes - but I am absolutely confident that results of the poll are
> completely reliable :)
Now me, as follows:
> Yes.Yes.Yes. Unfortunately the CONCLUSION supported by the person that
> was polled is false even if it was a wonderful digression from the
> topic at hand.
>
> Fun is nice. Thanks.
>
> FW
* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
|
|
|