HP3000-L Archives

December 1995, Week 5

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Leonard S. Berkowitz" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Leonard S. Berkowitz
Date:
Fri, 29 Dec 1995 10:41:00 PST
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (41 lines)
Sorry to reply to the whole group, but message to David Lethe was bounced
twice.
 
I would appreciate this information.  We have a 980-200.
 
Thanks.
 
 
 ----------
>From: owner-hp3000-l%UTCVM.UTC.EDU
>To: Multiple recipients of list HP3000-L
>Subject: Re: MPE poor performance
>Date: Friday, December 29, 1995 8:52AM
>
>---------------------- Information from the mail header
>-----------------------
>Sender:       HP-3000 Systems Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
>Poster:       "David A. Lethe" <[log in to unmask]>
>Organization: Datasys Computer Corporation
>Subject:      Re: MPE poor performance
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
 ----
>-
>
>There is absolutely no doubt that some systems will run slower with
>MPE/iX 5.0.  This is because HP chose not to compile code to the lowest
>common denominator PA-Risc hardware.
>
>Specifically 9x7 class machines will generally see no performance
>gains/losses, while the older systems should see 10-15% slower execution
>on certain applications...
>
>I have the specifics on what programs, percentage losses, etc... but I
>guess that anybody with the older hardware already knows this
>information, and anybody with the new hardware doesn't need it anyway.
>
>Happy new year
>
>David
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2