HP3000-L Archives

January 1998, Week 4

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Stan Sieler <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Stan Sieler <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 21 Jan 1998 22:23:27 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (37 lines)
Gavin writes:
>
> Deloy wrotes:
...
> > 08. Please tell us how your support levels have changed over the past
> >     08A. [ ] Dropped Basic support
> >     08B. [ ] Dropped Response Center support
> >     08C. [ ] Dropped Personal support
>
> Um, where do I check if we *added* support?

Gee...I just answered the survey, and must admit to not even noticing
the omission!

[Not referring to the Interex survey...]
It's *amazingly* difficult to design a good survey.  I've rarely
filled out a survey without having at least one yes/no box where I'd
like to say "maybe", or a multiple-choice where I'd like a different
choice.  In too many cases [on other surveys], the questions aren't
phrased well and will result in incorrect answers ... yet I'm sure the
survey taker won't realize it, and will use the data incorrectly.

[Back to the Interex survey & Gavin's comment]

Of course, even if three similar check boxes were added, what should
I check to indicate that I now have support *SOLELY* because I just
purchased a new computer?  I.e., I didn't "add" it ... that's expensive,
ridiculously so.

Speaking of which, hey...Deloy...there's no references to the unethical
call for 18 months of back support demanded by HP if you want to go back
on support after being off (for longer than 18 months).

--
Stan Sieler                                          [log in to unmask]
                                     http://www.allegro.com/sieler.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2