Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Mon, 21 Aug 2000 15:08:07 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Cortlandt responded to the claim in my ad copy:
With over 25 years of innovations your CSY team has improved
this platform to the point where it is the most robust OLTP
server available.
> John,
> That is a bold claim. Can you quickly justify it? The "jury"
> will be the readers of the ad.
> The IT world is full of hype. If anyone else were to claim
> that their operating system is THE best in a demanding category
> like robustness I would be very suspicious. Lets be sure that
> our claims are as reliable as MPE/iX.
> I would point out that the dynamic rollback feature of Image --
> Image's functional equivalent of the SQL "COMMIT" statement --
> sometimes fails.
Cortlandt,
While I see your point, I don't think you get mine. After all, we're NOT
preparing a legal brief here. We're trying to spur interest in a platform
that deserves a second look. So, I graciously invite "any other computer
maker" to refute my claim with hard facts. I don't think you'll find too
many takers. Besides, with all the totally overinflated B.S. in the world
surrounding computers, I think this line is but a smidgen, if at all. I
mean, after all, when it comes to computers, define the word "robust".
And as far as SQL COMMIT is concerned, I have seen that fail on more than
one occasion. But, you've never seen or heard Oracle admit to that
happening. That's a bug, not a feature!
John Hornberger
Sr. Systems Programmer
SPX Corporation
|
|
|