On Wed, 30 Nov 2005 16:35:44 -0500, Brice Yokem <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

>This is from an interview with Lawrence Wilkerson, former Chief of staff
>of
>Colin Powell.
>Now, why would this interview/article be biased?
>
>-------------------
>
><Snort>  This is Colin Powell's OPINION.  Even worse, it it the OPINION
>of someones OPINION.  GWB wasn't involved enough in
>the details...  how is this anything but opinion?  Why does GWB have a
>staff to do work for him, so he can do all the work himself?  He has to
>trust the information he was given by his staff is true, if he cannot do
>that there is no reason to have a staff.  If it turns out a staff member
>distorted details or cooked up false information, then that member's job
>is in jeopardy and that is how it should be.
>
>There is nothing in the article showing the opposing OPINION either, that
>is bias.

It is an interview. Questions to an insider when all this happened.
The someone is the former Chief óf Staff of Colin Powell who was the 65th 
Secretary of State
He heard what GWB staff said. He was in meetings.
Thats what he is telling. Not his opinion but what was said in meetings.
Or wasn't he in these meetings?
So, in your opinion, who is telling the truth?

* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *