On Feb 8, 2008 12:22 PM, Bob Schlosser <[log in to unmask]>
wrote:

> Some of the records that are currently secondarys may now become
> primaries with a larger capacity, reducing the number of blocks
> in the secondary chain.


It is true that they may be reduced, actually more likely than not, but not
necessarily so.  Any problem with finding the optimum capacity within a
narrow desired range?

On the other hand, increasing capacity substantially will increase unused
space in the dataset substantially, and therefore wasting disk cache to some
degree, depending on factors not given.

- Pete

* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *