HP3000-L Archives

May 2002, Week 1

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Bill Todd <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Bill Todd <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 2 May 2002 02:17:30 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (25 lines)
"David Froble" <[log in to unmask]> wrote in message
news:3CD0CAA5.1010202@tsoft-inc.com...
> Hey Bill, do you do anything besides watch for Rob's posts?  I never get
to jump
> on him first.

Actually, it's Rob's posts that seem to jump out at me, and responses have
become almost automatic since his material doesn't change much.  Of course,
that can give my responses a certain sameness as well...

Just to break the monotony, I'm thinking of making up a Letterman-style 'top
ten' list of reasons why we're all still breathlessly awaiting the public
debut of Itanic 2.  At this rate, EV7 and Hammer may not only be
embarrassingly faster, but embarrassingly faster to market as well.  And
(while on the subject of Itanic 2's wondrous performance if and when), I was
surprised to notice recently that USIII has made it up to 610 in SPECint2K
performance:  wouldn't it be amusing if after all the "Just wait for
McKinley!" hype over the past year Itanic *still* turned out to be at the
back of the pack?

- bill

* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *

ATOM RSS1 RSS2