Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Thu, 27 Feb 2003 08:35:54 +0200 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Thanks to Stan and Allegro for Mipstest.
Remember that it's not just the CPU that suffers - the entire IO is
adversely affected by the extremely crude crippling method.
======================================================================
@(#) MIPSTEST 2002-08-22
Copyright (c) 2002 Allegro Consultants, Inc. www.allegro.com
HPCPUNAME = SERIES e3000/N4000-100-22
raw MIPS = 210; MIPS scaled by ticks/instr = 437.8; (#i = 10000000)
Note: appears to be a crippled CPU system.
Determining max burp size...
Max burp size about = 383 microsecs (167076 ticks)
raw MIPS = 465; MIPS scaled by ticks/instr = 436.0; (#i = 178178)
Uncrippling would speed the CPU by a factor of 3.4
Attempting to determine length of CPU loss (blink)...
blink ticks: mean = 222122 ticks
Attempting to determine length of CPU use (burp)...
burp ticks: mean = 228490 ticks
======================================================================
@(#) MIPSTEST 2002-08-22
Copyright (c) 2002 Allegro Consultants, Inc. www.allegro.com
HPCPUNAME = SERIES e3000/N4000-100-33
raw MIPS = 317; MIPS scaled by ticks/instr = 439.4; (#i = 10000000)
Note: appears to be a crippled CPU system.
Determining max burp size...
raw MIPS = 339; MIPS scaled by ticks/instr = 439.7; (#i = 10000000)
Max burp size about = 3692 microsecs (1622169 ticks)
raw MIPS = 361; MIPS scaled by ticks/instr = 438.7; (#i = 1334838)
raw MIPS = 370; MIPS scaled by ticks/instr = 438.3; (#i = 1001128)
raw MIPS = 378; MIPS scaled by ticks/instr = 437.3; (#i = 563134)
raw MIPS = 465; MIPS scaled by ticks/instr = 436.0; (#i = 316762)
Uncrippling would speed the CPU by a factor of 1.4
Attempting to determine length of CPU loss (blink)...
blink ticks: mean = 123579 ticks
Attempting to determine length of CPU use (burp)...
burp ticks: mean = 327036 ticks
========================================================================
====
-----Original Message-----
From: Neil Harvey
Sent: 27 February 2003 08:22 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: N-class
@(#) MIPSTEST 2002-08-22
Copyright (c) 2002 Allegro Consultants, Inc. www.allegro.com
HPCPUNAME =3D SERIES e3000/N4000-200-44
raw MIPS =3D 460; MIPS scaled by ticks/instr =3D 345.4; (#i =3D =
10000000)
-----Original Message-----
From: KENT WALLACE [mailto:[log in to unmask]]=20
Sent: 26 February 2003 09:19 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: N-class
We have been on the N-Class 220 since last August. We have been very =
=3D impressed with the speed.=3D20
The 220 is a slowed down 440. I wonder what the 440 will do?
Kent Wallace
Boise, Id
* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
|
|
|