HP3000-L Archives

October 1996, Week 2

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Tracy Johnson <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Tracy Johnson <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 8 Oct 1996 17:29:00 PDT
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (31 lines)
Stan is right.  I double-checked "Normally" there is no leap year at the
end of a Century "except" those divisible by 400.  From CalTech:

URL: http://www.gps.caltech.edu/~eww/astro/lnode5.html
Summary:   In the Gregorian Calendar currently in use worldwide, there is
a leap year every year divisible by four except for years divisible by
100 and not divisible by 400. Therefore, the year 2000 will be a leap
year.
 ----------
From:  owner-hp3000-l[SMTP:[log in to unmask]]
Sent:  Tuesday, October 08, 1996 3:02 PM
To:  HP3000-L
Subject:  Re: Interesting date

Tracy writes:
> I seem to remember something from my Astronomy and Geography courses
that
> every 400 years, leap-year is supposed to be ignored, and it was
decided
...
> later refinement, I don't know), that the year 2000 was going to be one
> of those years.

Only in the sense that 2000 is evenly divisible by 400. :)

2000 is a leap year, so 2000-02-29 is a valid date that year.

 --
Stan Sieler                                          [log in to unmask]
                                     http://www.allegro.com/sieler.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2