HP3000-L Archives

January 1996, Week 2

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Bill Lancaster <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Bill Lancaster <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 9 Jan 1996 01:52:38 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (19 lines)
<Lot's of good comments from Steve Dirickson snipped>
 
I can't help but think that this whole transition away from HP-IB isn't long
overdue.  If I remember correctly, Digital had three separate I/O systems
within the PDP line, depending on the level, and that many people had to
upgrade their I/O systems to upgrade to new processors in, ostensibly, the
same line.  I believe that the IBM 360/370 systems forced the same thing.
I'm by no means a defender of those two companies, however, I think that HP
has done a fairly spectacular job forestalling the inevitable shift to
"better" technology.
 
Just my $.02 worth.
 
Bill Lancaster
(The artist formerly known as "employed at Lund Performance Solutions")
[log in to unmask]
---
 [log in to unmask]@proaxis.com

ATOM RSS1 RSS2