HP3000-L Archives

July 1996, Week 2

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Kevin L Newman <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Date:
Mon, 8 Jul 1996 08:33:40 EST
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (27 lines)
>Just a thought but with 5.5 around the corner you may want
>to move to it rather than 5.0 to take advantage of a
>significant number of new features.  The 5.5 release is based
>on 5.0 and would provide you the same or better reliability as
>5.0.  Future Express releases will probaly be delivered for 5.5
>not 5.0 so it catch you up to the latest release.
>
>Steve Cole
>Outer Banks Solutions
 
 
It just depends on what you are going after.  If you like upgrading, go for 5.5.
If on the other hand, you would like to get to a supported platform and don't
want to have to upgrade for a while, 5.0 is the answer.  The intermediate
releases are not supported for as long as the major releases. (unless this has
changed)
 
Also, as Steve has stated, if you are after some newer features, 5.5 has the
most current set of cool features.
 
At our site, we are more interested in limited downtime, long term stability,
and we don't jump on the new band wagon the first time around the block.  We are
just now talking about actually doing web servers and ODBC on our 'newly
upgraded to 5.0' machine.
 
Kevin Newman

ATOM RSS1 RSS2