Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Mon, 12 Feb 1996 00:02:49 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
In a message dated 96-02-07 20:22:03 EST, [log in to unmask]
(Jim Viera) writes:
>The bottom line, your best bet is to run Lasser/Rx or equivalent tool to see
>whay your physical I/O rates are in your current disk configuration. You
>can run Glance or equivalent if you don't have a data collector running on
>your system. Then size accordingly......
>
>We are getting over 30 physical I/O's per second on our disc arrays
>before they reach the 100% utilization. (C2254HA)
>
>
My experience with the C2252HA and C2254HA disk arrays yeilded
the exact same 30 I/Os per second that Jim observed. On systems with
higher I/O rates we were forced to use the C2252HA arrays to prevent the
I/O bottle necks. On system with lower I/O rates the C2258HA arrays
worked fine.
In addition to LaserRX, GlanceXL or other on-line performance monitoring
tools will provide a good insight to your systems performance. Keep in
mind that high I/O rates can be the caused by insufficient memory that
can cause excessive page faults or extremely fragmented disk. If your
I/O rates are too high for the arrays may there is a reason that needs to
be addressed.
Steve Cole
Outer Banks Solutions, Inc.
|
|
|