Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Fri, 1 Sep 2006 14:02:45 +0000 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
HP does a good job as a standard for the queues.. LEAVE them alone..
------QUANTUM-------
QUEUE BASE LIMIT MIN MAX ACTUAL BOOST TIMESLICE
----- ---- ----- --- --- ------ ----- ---------
CQ 152 200 1 2000 9 DECAY 200
DQ 202 238 2000 2000 2000 DECAY 200
EQ 240 253 2000 2000 2000 DECAY 200
E
-------------- Original message from Michael Caplin <[log in to unmask]>: --------------
> I've read thru some of the posted messages regarding this but I could use
>
> some help. Our N class box used to be dedicated at night for batch jobs
>
> but we're now allowing session users. The session users don't need too
>
> much but it looks like their presence is degrading the jobs running in th
> e
> batch queue. Last night (month-end) was a real joy.
>
> I'm planning to schedule a job to run at approx 10:00 pm that will alter
>
> the DS queue and then put it back to where it was via a second scheuled j
> ob
> at 5:00 am.
>
> This is the 10:00 pm job. Any suggestions ?
>
> Mike
>
> !COMMENT * THESE ARE THE DEFAULT VALUES
> !COMMENT
> !COMMENT ------QUANTUM-------
> !COMMENT QUEUE BASE LIMIT MIN MAX BOOST TIMESLICE
> !COMMENT ----- ---- ----- --- --- ----- ---------
> !COMMENT CQ 152 200 1 2000 DECAY 200
> !COMMENT DQ 202 238 2000 2000 DECAY 200
> !COMMENT EQ 240 253 2000 2000 DECAY 200
> !
> !TUNE DQ=152,200,1
> !EOJ
>
> * To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
> * etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
|
|
|