Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Wed, 23 Feb 2000 15:22:42 -0800 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
You know what. I really like Wirt, I like QCTerm, and I like AICS,
however... I can't imagine any other vendor that could have a prolonged
development discussion on this list without getting absolutely blasted
by a large number of people on this list. The amount of bandwidth that
is used recently on QCTerm has been absolutely insane. I can certainly
sit and delete it all day, but I just find the double standard a bit
odd. think about it.
Shawn
Sletten Kenneth W KPWA wrote:
> There were a couple complaints that this thread is not pertinent
> to 3000-L:
>
> > My delete key is also smooth, no trace of delete.
> > I second this motion, and if it wasn't a motion I'll make
> > it one and second it.
> > Gary Sielaff
> >
> > >You're wearing out my delete key with this endless
> > discussion that is about as related to the HP3000 list as The
> > Back Street Boys..
>
> Sorry, I respectfully but completely disagree with the above:
> How users access an HP 3000 is a completely proper and very
> pertinent discussion for 3000-L. I make a substitute motion and
> strongly urge this good technical discussion continue for as long
> as there is still anything productive to discuss....
>
> Ken Sletten
|
|
|