<<> I keep running into a reoccurring problem regarding two-level
re-defined
> fields in the Dictionary3000 and Transacts inability to LIST them.

The simplest workaround for this problem is to

MOVE (KSL-RTRANS-NO) = " ";

somewhere in your code. It is needed only once. This will cause the
Transact compiler to bring in the lower level subitem definitions.>>


For those still segmenting their programs this is (or at least was) also
one of the situations where you had to reference the item in segment 0,
even if you didn't otherwise use it there, so that non-0 segments would
recognize the item.

Steve