Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Mon, 17 Apr 1995 12:52:48 GMT |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Tom Stelter ([log in to unmask]) wrote:
: We have done a prototype of this but now need to address security,
: mutli-threaded access, etc. Are you forking numerous processes to handle
: this? Or does your batch job single-thread all the incoming requests? If
: so, do you have any queueing mechanism for the requests or any routing of
: the responses built in?
: ----------
I was speaking hypothetically. If I were designing it, it would probably
be a batch job, single-threading the requests. Of course, with the POSIX
shell, and the fork mechanism, it would be possible to have a listener
task that would launch a child process to handle each separate request that
came in. There are numerous ways this could be accomplished. I was just
trying to point out that message files were not the only way to go.
DISCLAIMER: I am not making a statment for my employer. This is just my
own opinion.
|
|
|