HP3000-L Archives

March 2002, Week 1

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Mike Church <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Mike Church <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 1 Mar 2002 11:40:25 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (71 lines)
just a thought...
what if God chose evolution as the method of creation?

mc

-----Original Message-----
From: Harrington, Don [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Friday, March 01, 2002 11:37 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [HP3000-L] OT: Ohio wants to teach "2001" in 2002 and
beyond


My personal feeling is that evolution is just the way God managed things.  I
have no problem incorporating both theories into my world view.

Don Harrington
Sr. Systems Analyst
Facilities Applications Support
Shared Services Group
The Boeing Company
P.O. Box 3707 M/C 6C-AK
Seattle, WA  98124-2207
(v) 425-234-1145 (f) 425-234-0464 (p) 206-797-6360

The opinions expressed in this e-mail reflect those of the sender.  They do
not necessarily reflect the opinions of The Boeing Company unless
specifically stated otherwise.



-----Original Message-----
From: Steve Dirickson [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 3:52 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [HP3000-L] OT: Ohio wants to teach "2001" in 2 002and
beyond


> Remember the context of this discussion:  Intelligent design
> theory.  It is
> the opinion of the author of the web page I cited that
> natural selection
> performs all the functions of an intelligent designer, which
> was formerly
> known as God, Christian or otherwise.  In other words, he is
> saying that we
> have merely swapped one definition of God for another when we
propose
> natural selection as the the Designer.
> ....
> In general, theologians have always pondered how we got here
> and why we are
> here.  These are questions that evolution tries to answer as well.

I don't see it. Evolution provides an answer--that appears to be
elegant, consistent, and complete--to "how"; I don't see anything
anywhere in it that remotely tries to address "why". Which is why this
"you must choose God or evolution" thing seems so stupid to me:
allowing only one of them means that you'll always be "wrong", because
you'll have only part of the answer.

* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *

* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *

* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *

ATOM RSS1 RSS2