Richard,
I don't have any specifics. It just that I have heard the rumor before
and it was recently re-iterated by somebody near me that there is (was)
something to do with key sizes or record numbers and the capacity of the
Omnidex dataset that impacted the performance and possibly even prevented
the functionality of Omnidex. Perhaps it's just like most rumors, more are
then anything else.
Thanx,
Jon Backus
HP Systems Manager
AB&C Group
----------
From: Richard Trapp RAT
To: Backuj; HP3000-L
Subject: RE: Omnidex sizing
Date: Wednesday, January 01, 1997 7:58AM
From: Richard Trapp RAT
Date: Fri, Apr 25, 1997 7:58 AM
Subject: RE: Omnidex sizing
To: Backuj; HP3000-L
Jon,
Doesn't ring any bells with me. If you'd like to send some specifics
to me or to [log in to unmask], we'll see what we can come up with.
Rich
--------------
Rich Trapp
OMNIDEX Product Manager - IMAGE/SQL
Dynamic Information Systems Corporation http://www.disc.com
Work: [log in to unmask] Play: [log in to unmask]
Voice: 303-444-4000 Fax: 303-444-0208
-----Original Message-----
From: Backuj [SMTP:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 23, 1997 2:33 PM
To: HP3000-L
Subject: Omnidex sizing
People,
An old rumor as reemerged and I would like to finally put it to
rest.
Is there something to do with the capacity of the omnidex added datasets
(pre 3.0) and the number of records in the dataset that has omnidex
applied
to it? The rumor, although not clear, has something to do with the
record
numbers of the "real" data and the size of the omnidex added datasets.
Does
any of this ring a bell with anybody?
Thanx,
Jon Backus
HP Systems Manager
AB&C Group
----------
Received: from SUN2.OMNIDEX.COM by portia.fabrik.com
with SMTP (Fabrik F07.0-000)
id [log in to unmask] ; Fri, 25 Apr 1997 06:57:09 -0700
Received: from smtp.disc.com ([192.69.46.246]) by sun2.disc.com
(8.7.5/8.7.5)
with SMTP id HAA05172; Fri, 25 Apr 1997 07:56:12 -0600 (MDT)
Received: by smtp.disc.com with Microsoft Mail
id <[log in to unmask]>; Fri, 25 Apr 97 08:02:21 PDT
From: Richard Trapp RAT <[log in to unmask]>
To: Backuj <[log in to unmask]>, HP3000-L <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: RE: Omnidex sizing
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 97 07:58:00 PDT
Message-ID: <[log in to unmask]>
Encoding: 36 TEXT
X-Mailer: Microsoft Mail V3.0
----------
|
