On Sun, 26 Sep 2004 03:23:57 -0700, Craig Lalley <[log in to unmask]>
wrote:

>--- Tracy Pierce <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
>> Yes, Shawn, you can say anything you want with statistics.
>>
>> When Richie Rich pays 1% of his $10million income, that's a lot more than
>> the 35% of my $100k that I pay.  So yep, he's covering more of the tax
>> burden.
>
>After listening to the list... I figure it comes down to this.
>
>If you think that taxes are required to help pay for the burden of
Government
>infrastructure, i.e. common defense, police, fire department etc...
>Consider yourself a fiscal conservative.
>

His house is bigger then mine and therefore needs more firemen in case.
He needs more policmen to proctect him and his then I do.

==> He should pay alot more then I do.



>If you think that taxes are to spread the wealth, i.e. rob from Peter (Bill
>Gates) to pay someone who doesn't have a job, doesn't want a job, wouldn't
even
>consider looking for a job.... well that's liberal.
>
>-Craig
>
and what about those who don't have a job, want a job and can't find a job?
working at McD/Burger King/Wendys is nor a job that pays the bills.

* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *