Ï duplicated this on our production-box, and, after this (James')
message, tried it on our test-box (which is more patched; pp6 vs pp4).
The result was:
------------------8<-------
 Item  Subsystem   Name   G/N  Description      Used   High    Max
____________________________________________________________________

  1    NS XPORT  CP_POOL_ (G)  Control Buf Pool    0      1    300 :)
  2    NS XPORT  1536____ (G)  Inbound Buf Pool   34    105    170 :)
  3    NS XPORT  LOOP____ (N)  Outbnd  Buf Pool    0     21    128 :)
  4    NS XPORT  LAN1____ (N)  Outbnd  Buf Pool    0     50    256 :)
  5    NS XPORT  UDP      (G)  GProt  Msg  Pool   50    N/A    512 :)
  6    NS XPORT  PXP      (G)  GProt  Msg  Pool    1    N/A    660 :)
  7    NS XPORT  PROBE    (G)  CM Prot Msg Pool    1    N/A    678 :)
  8    NS XPORT  IP_NI    (G)  IP-NI  Msg  Pool   50    N/A   2048 :)
  9    NS XPORT  IP_NI    (G)  IP-NI  Msg  Pool  119    N/A   2048 :)
 10    NS XPORT           (G)  Node  Name Cache    0    360    360 :)
 11    NS XPORT           (G)  TCP Control pool    1     22   2048 :)
                                ^^^^^

/per


> Hello Friends @ 3000-l,
>  
> Re: MPE/ix unidentified network buffer
>  
> -----------------------------------------------------------Andy Seipos
writes--
> Two days after w get the following numbers from
nettool/resources/display from
> our 939KS, buffer #11 maxes out and, just coincidentally(?), no one
can log in
> via TCPIP.  Log ins via serial connection to DTC continued to work,
but that's
> all. Any idea what line 11 below is?
>  
>        MON, MAY 10, 1999, 11:47:53 AM
>         Item  Subsystem   Name   G/N  Description      Used   High    
Max
>        
____________________________________________________________________
> ...
>         11    NS XPORT           (G)   1986   2004   2048 :(
> -----------------------------------------------------------Andy Seipos
writes--
>  
> Hmmm... I am not sure I have seen this behavior before...  but I know
some
> additional resources were added to be monitored with nettool.
>  
> Plan:
>   1. From this display it is apparent to me that NSTFD10 5.5 General
Release
>      patch is not installed on this machine.  NSTFD10 is older than
dirt (it
....