Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Tue, 6 Sep 2005 15:27:11 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Chuck writes:
> There have been a few posts in this thread that point to existing
> refineries and say "Would you want one of those smelly, dirty and
> polluting things next door to you?".
Russ preceded with:
> Additionally, the "refineries" can be made smaller; are less or non
> damaging to their surroundings; are much more easily retooled to produce
> gas on Monday, home heating oil on Tuesday etc; and would address the
> elephant in the room issue as well. Local ownership, or even municipal
> ownership is possible, thereby removing the big oil companies from the
> picture.
In light of the Eastern blackout and terrorist attacks, it would appear that
centralizing energy production is a bad idea. Whether a man-made or natural
disaster, they are more devastating to long distribution channels and
central energy production.
As many who have studied Just-In-Time techniques, smaller is better. It is
usually cheaper to add capacity in smaller chunks AND it provides redunancy
in case a single unit goes down. We are seeing the same movement in
computers with virtualization and server/disc farms. We should be doing the
same with our utilities - at least in residential areas.
I agree here with Russ. Want a better world? Think local.
Mark W.
* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
|
|
|