HP3000-L Archives

September 2005, Week 1

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Mark Wonsil <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Mark Wonsil <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 6 Sep 2005 15:27:11 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (31 lines)
Chuck writes:
> There have been a few posts in this thread that point to existing
> refineries and say "Would you want one of those smelly, dirty and
> polluting things next door to you?".

Russ preceded with:
> Additionally, the "refineries" can be made smaller; are less or non
> damaging to their surroundings; are much more easily retooled to produce
> gas on Monday, home heating oil on Tuesday etc; and would address the
> elephant in the room issue as well.  Local ownership, or even municipal
> ownership is possible, thereby removing the big oil companies from the
> picture.

In light of the Eastern blackout and terrorist attacks, it would appear that
centralizing energy production is a bad idea. Whether a man-made or natural
disaster, they are more devastating to long distribution channels and
central energy production.

As many who have studied Just-In-Time techniques, smaller is better. It is
usually cheaper to add capacity in smaller chunks AND it provides redunancy
in case a single unit goes down. We are seeing the same movement in
computers with virtualization and server/disc farms. We should be doing the
same with our utilities - at least in residential areas.

I agree here with Russ. Want a better world? Think local.

Mark W.

* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *

ATOM RSS1 RSS2