HP3000-L Archives

December 1999, Week 4

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
Date:
Wed, 22 Dec 1999 18:46:01 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (14 lines)
One thing occurred to me. By using a two-digit year since the beginning,
hasn't everyone already been using Date Windowing with a split-year of
"00" instead of "50"? That alone should blow the patent dead.

Tom Renz wrote:
>
> Good News!!
>
> The Y2K "Date Windowing" concept recently assigned a patent has been ordered by the Assistant Secretary and Commissioner of the Patent Office for reexamination on December 21.
>
> For further info you can see the story at "http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/com/speeches/99-51.htm".
>
> Tom Renz

ATOM RSS1 RSS2