At 7:13 PM -0600 7/22/02, Rene Woc wrote:
>Hello Denys,
>
>At 7:42 PM -0500 7/22/02, you wrote:
>
>>Leaving my argument about tape subsystem technology with Stan aside for a
>>minute, the TC file is filecode -430. I am rather surprised that Adager did
>>not copy it. If it did not, it probably had a reason not to. For the newly
>>copied database, what does a DBUTIL SHOW MYDB ALL reveal about the
>>attachment? If it does not complain, perhaps it was not attached at the
>>time of the copy and therefore the TC was left behind as an extraneous file.
>
>Adager database copies are not attached to SQL DBEs even though the
>source database may be. This is a design decision, since users most
>likely do not want to attach the database copy to the same DBE the
>source database is. Therefore, it does not copy the TC file because
>it's not relevant.
I should have said all of this, explicitly (even though some people
have complained about Adager's verbosity :-)
Sorry about the confusion caused by my lack of an explicit message
during Adager's "copy database" function. I made a note to correct
this oversight.
>If the user wishes to attach the database copy to some SQL DBE, I
>recommend using your IMAGE/SQL utility to extract all relevant
>"attach" information from the source database.
Just to be explicit, I want to make sure that everybody is on
the same page as Rene: When Rene says "your IMAGE/SQL utility",
he refers to the utility that Denys wrote.
Denys: If I remember correctly, you kindly made your IMAGE/SQL
utility available for download. Could you please refresh our
collective memory with the URL?
Thanks,
_______________
| |
| |
| r | Alfredo [log in to unmask]
| e | http://www.adager.com
| g | F. Alfredo Rego
| a | Manager, R & D Labs
| d | Adager Corporation
| A | Sun Valley, Idaho 83353-3000 U.S.A.
| |
|_______________|
* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
|
