HP3000-L Archives

December 1997, Week 2

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Michael L Gueterman <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Michael L Gueterman <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 10 Dec 1997 08:33:32 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (31 lines)
Maybe I missed something here, but what is causing you
to reboot the 3000 that is Samba/Posix related?  I shudder
to think that anyone would say that NT is more stable than
MPE (even if it is playing on it's home court :)

Regards,
Michael (yes, I rely on NT too) Gueterman
Easy Does It Technologies
email: [log in to unmask]
http://www.editcorp.com
voice: (888) 858-EDIT -or- (509) 943-5108
fax:   (509) 946-1170
--

----------
From:  Frank Letts[SMTP:[log in to unmask]]
Sent:  Wednesday, December 10, 1997 10:03 AM
To:  [log in to unmask]
Subject:  Re: [HP3000-L] BillBashing, GateCrashing.

Err, uh, sorry, but, I've been with MPE since 1972 (Bad year), and
seem to recall that it was darned stable (robust?) by 76.  Never got
as solid as RTE, but no one has.  NT looks good, but I'll reserve
judgement on it until its been arround a while.  It *does* seem to do
a much better job as a file server than MPE with Samba.  At least it
doesn't need rebooting quite as often, but that is samba/posix, not
MPE.


[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2