That is not an INSTALL, it is a REMOTE UPDATE. A very big difference!
"Paveza, Gary" wrote:
>
> Not sure if this fits your experience, but this is what HP has done for us
> in the past.
>
> They create a CSLT on another system (one of theirs) which contains the FOS,
> patches, and subsys. They then bring it in and do the install on site.
> Saves a lot of time.
> -------------------------------------------------------------
> Gary L. Paveza, Jr.
> Technical Services Manager
> (302) 761-3173 - voice
> (800) 217-5808 - pager
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Curtis Larsen [SMTP:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2000 12:04 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: [HP3000-L] INSTALLing MPE/iX 6.0?
>
> Thanks to my PSS dollars at work, HP will be coming out to upgrade
> me
> from 5.5 to 6.0. The interesting thing about it -- aside that for
> once,
> it is not ME doing the upgrade [whoohoo!] -- is that they are
> insisting
> that the process requires an INSTALL instead of an UPDATE.
> ("'Curioser
> and curioser'", said Alice".)
>
> Well now, since the system is a test system (and they'll be the ones
> making everything Be Happy), I don't mind much, but I was
> wondering:
> Does anyone know whether or not this a technical requirement, or is
> is
> just preference on HP's part?
>
> If an INSTALL really is required, why so?
>
> Thanks!
> Curtis
>
> -----------------------------------------------------
> Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail transmission
> may contain confidential or legally privileged
> information that is intended only for the individual
> or entity named in the e-mail address. If you are not
> the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
> any disclosure, copying, distribution, or reliance
> upon the contents of this e-mail is strictly prohibited.
>
> If you have received this e-mail transmission in error,
> please reply to the sender, so that Covance can arrange
> for proper delivery, and then please delete the message
> from your inbox. Thank you. << File: TEXT.htm >>
|
