Re:
> They migrated their programs to NM mode (but not their data, still recorded
> in 16bits format in their DB). They gained better performance of course,
> but for a short time : performances were soon as bad as before. The reason
Sounds like a "third bear of IMAGE" problem should be considered.
BTW, I agree with Gavin and Craig L's posts.
It looks like you need a real performance analysis. Don't forget
the usefulness of SPT/iX, BTW.
Also, during your busy times ... what does the "speedometer" say
your CPU utilization is? If it's less than, say, 70 or 80%,
then you're probably waiting on disk.
speedometer:
At the hardware console, press control-B. That should start a display,
at the bottom left of the screen, of four-digit hex numbers.
If the system is still somewhat alive, there should be a pair of
hex numbers alternating between FFFF and F#FF (e.g., F7FF).
We're interested in that F#FF, not the FFFF.
The '#' is the percent busy, divided by 10. Thus, F5FF is 50% busy.
And FAFF is 100% busy (hex A is 10).
Out of curiousity, what MPE/iX version were you running on your
9x7 systems? (It clearly wasn't 7.5 ... thanks to HP Marketing)
--
Stan Sieler
[log in to unmask]
www.allegro.com/sieler/wanted/index.html
* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
|