Wirt Atmar wrote:
>
...>
> My sincere apologies for this, but as soon as we have exhaustively tested all
> of QCTerm's possibilities and alternative designs, we'll release this new
> behavior. What I don't want to do is create a design structure that is
> non-optimal and find that fact out later, meaning that we would have to later
> release a new, revised architecture -- and make you all abandon whatever work
> you've put into supporting the old structure. That's my worst nightmare in
> all of this.
>

Are there design specifications (for programming our applications) that
you consider stable?  Can we at least begin design work on applications
we anticipate working in form mode with qcterm?

Richard

> Internet time be damned. We're on the Atmarian calendar now :-).
>
> To answer the inevitable question: I'm hoping for Christmas, or a little
> before.
>
> Wirt Atmar

--
Richard L Gambrell
Senior Information Technology Consultant
University of Tennessee at Chattanooga
103 Hunter Hall, Dept. 4454
615 McCallie Ave., Chattanooga, TN 37403-2598
voice mail/cell phone: 423-432-5122
private e-mail: [log in to unmask]
UTC fax: 423-755-4150
UTC phone: 423-755-4551
UTC email: [log in to unmask]