Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Mon, 15 Nov 1999 09:25:40 -0600 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
william l brandt wrote in message ...
>I'm still learning about MPE/ix but I believe that the performance
>improvements of the 9x8 series over the 9x7 is only a fairly small margin -
>although if different I'm sure there are enough people on this list with
>charts to correct me ;-)
>
Performance of the 917 unit is basically the same as a 918 unless Floating
Point computation
is done. The Floating Point Unit is integrated into the CPU chip in a '918;
but on a '917, one
must have an optional Floating Point Co-Processor installed to equal the
'918 (got mine for
about $200 or so). An advantage of the '917 is that is has on-board battery
backup for memory
and can survive a powerfail without having to buy a UPS. Also, I think
memory prices seem
to be cheaper for the '917 in my experience. The '917 and '918 machines
are considerably
more powerful than a Series '70 and are in the class with '960s or '949s in
CPU performance--
with a much smaller footprint and power requirement. Just load it up with
memory and and
a floating point unit, and that '917 will still handle some tough chores.
The 917/927/937/947
boxes all have the same CPU and clock speed, and differ only in the User
License count.
Winston K.
|
|
|