Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Wed, 24 Apr 1996 21:03:26 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
In a message dated 96-04-17 09:50:05 EDT, [log in to unmask] (Jon
Broz) replied:
> >I must soon convert my serial connections from PC s to a Series 937SX
> >to a PC network. I am concerned about degradation of HP3000
> >performance if I attempt to convert it to a network server using
> >Netware/ix, and I am not quite sure what the cons are to networking
> >an Intel server with the Series 937SX. The PC Lan (Departmental)
> >will be connected to an agency wide area network. Netware/ix vs.
> >Intel Server?
>
>
> Please keep in mind that moving the PC's from serial to network
> connections does not, in itself, require you to put Netware/iX on your
> HP3000. You should only need Netware/iX if you want to use your
> HP3000 as a file and/or printer server for the PC applications.
True. What is required is Thinlan/ix which is now included in FOS 5.0
> The session connections to the HP3000 via the LAN will typically be
> made using either HP-VT or Telnet, neither of which will require you
> to have Netware/iX.
If you are using reflections, that will require VT Sessions. If you are
using Business Sessions, requires a TCP/IP protocal (recommend Frontier
Technologies). Minisofts emulator I believe does not require additional
purchases.
> If I read your message correctly, it sounded as if you were mostly
> concerned with switching from sessions via serial connections to
> sessions via LAN connections.
The benefits of switching are great. Multiple sessions, faster file
transfers, network printing (of course this requires a third party package,
I recommend ESPUL from RAC)
If your pc's are pentiums, purchase PCI lan cards. There is a difference.
Rick Clark
Former Systems Manager Nook Industries
Now Systems Analyst Weltman, Weinberg & Reis
|
|
|